Freddie Fender Verified Attorney

Alexander Granovsky
Employment Law
Ready to speak with this attorney?
Be sure to mention FreddieFender.com
Freddie's Review
Alexander Granovsky Learned How Powerful Organizations Litigate—Then Chose to Represent Employees
In 2010, Alexander Granovsky made a consequential change. After working at major firms including Baker Botts, K&L Gates, Kauff McGuire & Margolis, and Crowell & Moring, he stepped away from representing large corporations and co-founded Granovsky & Sundaresh PLLC with his wife, Neeti Sundaresh. Their practice began at a kitchen table and grew into an employment-law firm serving workers and executives from New York City and Cleveland. The scale changed, but the sophistication of the work did not. Granovsky brought his corporate litigation experience to the side that often begins a workplace dispute with fewer resources and far less leverage.
His understanding of complex cases also comes from time spent inside the federal judiciary. Before entering private practice, he served as a law clerk to Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The role gave him firsthand exposure to how federal judges examine evidence, evaluate arguments, and decide whether a case deserves to move forward—experience that matters when an employer responds to a claim with an aggressive effort to have it dismissed.
That preparation produced a significant result for more than 700 employees at six Brooklyn Domino’s franchises. In Chowdhury v. Raja 786 Food Inc., Granovsky represented workers seeking compensation under New York City’s Fair Workweek Law, which protects employees from certain last-minute scheduling changes and back-to-back closing and opening shifts without additional pay. The $800,000 recovery became one of the first federally approved class settlements under the law, turning workplace protections into meaningful compensation for hundreds of employees.
Another case tested what happens when evidence disappears. In Adler v. Sonotec US Inc., Granovsky represented a former employee who said she was fired after rejecting a supervisor’s unwanted advances. The court dismissed the supervisor’s counterclaim and sanctioned the defendants for deleting relevant text messages, allowing jurors to presume that the missing evidence would have been unfavorable to them. When the corporate parent later tried to end the case before trial, the court refused. The matter subsequently settled.
He has also demonstrated an ability to enter a difficult case and restore its momentum. When a worker’s previous lawyers withdrew from Nikonov v. Flirt NY Inc., Granovsky took over the representation and helped defeat most of the employer’s attempt to eliminate the claims. The worker preserved federal and state wage claims and ultimately accepted a $12,500 judgment resolving the dispute.
Court is only one part of his practice. Under Granovsky’s leadership, the firm has obtained more than $50 million for clients through severance negotiations since 2010. That work can involve salary, health benefits, equity, and restrictions that may interfere with a client’s next job. The firm has also helped hundreds of employees navigate noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements, giving professionals a clearer understanding of what they can do before making a career-changing decision.
Granovsky’s work has earned selection to Super Lawyers every year from 2014 through 2026, following two Rising Stars selections. Journalists at CNN, Fortune, Vice, and other national outlets have also sought his perspective on layoffs, overtime pay, wage laws, and separation agreements. His New York practice maintains an impressive 4.9-star Google rating based on more than 450 reviews.
The decision that shaped Granovsky’s career still defines his value to consumers. He learned complex litigation while representing powerful organizations, then chose to use that experience for individuals confronting them. For an employee facing unpaid compensation, retaliation, discrimination, a restrictive agreement, or a consequential severance decision, that perspective can help restore balance to a situation that rarely begins with both sides standing on equal ground.
That combination of experience, reputation, verified professional standing, and public credibility is why Alexander Granovsky was included on FreddieFender.com.
Credentials
- Juris Doctor, New York University School of Law, 2002
- Bachelor of Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1997
- Admitted to practice in Ohio
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
- Admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Member of the New York State Bar Association
- Member of the Russian-Speaking Business Attorneys Network
- Languages: English and Russian
Career Highlights / Proven Experience
Career Highlights
- Firm Co-Founder and Managing Member: Co-founded Granovsky & Sundaresh PLLC with Neeti Sundaresh in 2010 and leads the firm’s employment-law practice, which serves workers and executives through offices in New York City and Cleveland.
- Big-Law Foundation: Developed his early litigation experience at major national and international firms, including Baker Botts LLP, K&L Gates LLP, Kauff McGuire & Margolis, and Crowell & Moring LLP, before shifting his practice from representing large corporations to advocating for individuals facing workplace problems.
- Federal Judicial Clerkship: Served as a federal judicial law clerk to Judge Dennis M. Cavanaugh of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, gaining firsthand insight into federal court procedure and judicial decision-making.
- More Than $50 Million Through Severance Negotiations: Under Granovsky’s leadership, the firm has obtained more than $50 million for clients through severance-package negotiations since 2010, addressing compensation, benefits, equity, and restrictions affecting future employment.
- Noncompete and Career-Mobility Experience: Has helped hundreds of employees navigate noncompete and nonsolicitation restrictions, including evaluating enforceability and developing strategies intended to protect their ability to pursue new employment.
- Sustained Super Lawyers Recognition: Selected to the New York Super Lawyers list every year from 2014 through 2026, following Rising Stars selections in 2012 and 2013.
- Employment-Law Media Authority: Has been quoted by CNN, Fortune, Vice, the Society for Human Resource Management, and The Muse on layoffs, overtime compensation, wage-payment requirements, and employee rights in separation agreements.
- Professional and Community Service: Serves as a judge for the American Bar Association’s National Appellate Advocacy Competition and as a board member of the Kings Bay YM-YWHA.
- Exceptional Client Feedback: The New York practice maintains an impressive 4.9-star Google rating supported by hundreds of reviews, giving prospective clients a substantial body of public feedback.
Proven Experience
- $800,000 Fair Workweek Settlement: Represented employees of six Brooklyn Domino’s franchises in Chowdhury v. Raja 786 Food Inc., securing one of the first federally approved class settlements under New York City’s Fair Workweek Law. The recovery compensated workers for unpaid premiums connected to last-minute scheduling changes and back-to-back closing and opening shifts.
- Hostile-Work-Environment Case Settled After Major Pretrial Victories: Represented a former employee who alleged that she was fired after rejecting a supervisor’s unwanted advances. In Adler v. Sonotec US Inc., the court dismissed the supervisor’s counterclaim, sanctioned the defendants for deleting relevant text messages by allowing jurors to presume the missing evidence was unfavorable, and rejected the corporate parent’s attempt to end the case before trial. The parties subsequently reached a settlement.
- $12,500 Wage-and-Hour Judgment: Entered Nikonov v. Flirt NY Inc. after the worker’s previous lawyers withdrew and helped defeat most of the employer’s request for summary judgment, preserving federal and state wage claims. The worker subsequently accepted a judgment resolving the case.
- Substantial Discrimination Settlement and Continued Health Coverage: Represented a worker in a discrimination and retaliation matter, obtaining a substantial monetary settlement while also negotiating continued protection of the client’s employment-based health-insurance benefits.
- Appellate Victory After Electronic Evidence Was Destroyed: Represented plaintiffs in Chan v. Cheung, a defamation action in which the appellate court struck the defendant’s answer after relevant electronic evidence was not preserved. The ruling imposed a significant consequence for the destruction of evidence and materially strengthened the clients’ position.
Meet Alexander
No video submitted by attorney yet.
Ready to speak with this attorney?
Be sure to mention FreddieFender.com
Before You Hire
Choosing the right attorney is an important decision, and knowing what to ask can help you make it with confidence. We've prepared a set of questions for each area of practice to help you better understand an attorney's experience, approach, fees, and what to expect before making your decision.
Select an area of practice below to see the questions you should ask before hiring an attorney.
