Freddie Fender Verified Attorney

Jessica T. Arena
Immigration Law
Ready to speak with this attorney?
Be sure to mention FreddieFender.com
Freddie's Review
Jessica T. Arena Turns Immigration Limbo Into a Federal Court Fight
For immigrants waiting on a green card, asylum interview, naturalization decision, or family petition, the most punishing word in the English language may be pending. Months become years. Careers stall, families remain separated, and carefully planned futures are placed on hold—all while another inquiry to the government produces little more than another request to wait. Jessica T. Arena built her practice around the moment when waiting is no longer acceptable.
Arena is the founder and principal attorney of JT Arena Law, a San Francisco firm devoted to federal immigration litigation. She does not operate as a conventional immigration lawyer preparing applications or guiding routine filings through USCIS. Her work begins when an immigration agency has failed to act. Arena files mandamus lawsuits and Administrative Procedure Act claims designed to bring that delay before a federal court and compel the government to make a decision.
That distinction matters. A mandamus lawsuit cannot guarantee that an immigration application will be approved, but it can force an agency to confront a case it has allowed to sit unresolved. Arena evaluates the length and circumstances of the delay, determines the strongest jurisdiction and timing, prepares the federal complaint, and negotiates directly with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Her practice reports resolving hundreds of delayed immigration matters nationwide, with many cases reaching a resolution or enforceable adjudication deadline within 60 to 90 days.
The individual outcomes show what that work can mean in practical terms. Arena served as lead counsel in five reported mandamus cases that produced asylum-interview notices within 60 days of USCIS receiving the complaints. Five additional asylum and adjustment-of-status applications were adjudicated within the same period. Another federal action resulted in a detained client’s release within 60 days. In a separate matter, litigation broke through a two-year I-485 delay: the client received an interview notice within approximately one month and obtained approval the day after the interview.
Her record also extends beyond delay litigation. In Al Rikabi v. Garland, Arena represented an Iraqi asylum seeker before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court granted the petition in part after determining that immigration authorities had disregarded plausible circumstantial evidence concerning the motive for the client’s persecution. The case was remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further consideration—a consequential second opportunity in a matter involving asylum protection.
That appellate result reflects a legal foundation developed long before Arena established her current practice. After earning her law degree from the University of California, Davis School of Law, she completed a Justice First public-interest fellowship, represented immigrants in nonprofit settings before USCIS, and worked on federal civil-rights litigation involving prisoner abuse and institutional accountability. Those experiences exposed her to both the human consequences of government inaction and the courtroom tools available to challenge it.
Arena’s command of federal immigration litigation has also earned the attention of the profession itself. The American Immigration Lawyers Association identified her with its Benefits Litigation Committee and selected her to teach programs addressing asylum, detention, mandamus litigation, and what happens after a motion to dismiss. She was also chosen as faculty for the National Immigration Project’s intensive three-part “March Mandamus” training for immigration advocates.
Client feedback reinforces that professional standing. JT Arena Law maintains a 5.0-star Google rating across 127 reviews, with clients repeatedly describing cases that began moving after years of uncertainty. Past outcomes never guarantee future results, but Arena’s record demonstrates something unusually valuable: a focused ability to transform administrative silence into a federal case the government must answer.
That combination of experience, reputation, verified professional standing, and public credibility is why Jessica T. Arena was included on FreddieFender.com.
Credentials
- Juris Doctor, University of California, Davis School of Law (King Hall), 2014
- Admitted to the State Bar of California on December 16, 2014
Career Highlights / Proven Experience
Career Highlights
- Firm Founder: Serves as Principal Attorney and Founder of JT Arena Law, where she has developed a nationwide federal practice focused on mandamus lawsuits and Administrative Procedure Act claims involving delayed immigration applications.
- Nationwide Federal Litigation Practice: Represents immigrants in federal district courts across the country, personally overseeing litigation strategy, substantive briefing, negotiations with U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, and court appearances. Her firm reports successfully resolving hundreds of delayed immigration matters.
- National Immigration-Law Faculty: Chosen as faculty for the 2025 AILA Midwinter Conference’s advanced asylum and detention program, the 2026 AILA Annual Conference’s session on APA and mandamus litigation, and the National Immigration Project’s three-part “March Mandamus” federal-court training.
- Public-Interest Foundation: Completed a Justice First fellowship and spent several years representing immigrants in nonprofit settings before USCIS before concentrating her practice on federal immigration litigation.
- Federal Civil-Rights Background: Developed broader federal litigation experience through co-counsel roles in prisoner-rights and institutional-accountability cases before focusing her practice on immigration delays.
- Strong Public Feedback: Maintains a displayed 5.0 Google rating based on 127 reviews, reflecting substantial public feedback from immigration clients.
Proven Experience
- Ninth Circuit Asylum Remand: Represented the petitioner in Al Rikabi v. Garland, where the Ninth Circuit granted the petition in part and remanded the asylum claim to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The court determined that the agency had disregarded plausible circumstantial evidence and that its finding concerning the persecutor’s motive was unsupported by substantial evidence.
- Court-Documented Asylum Interview Secured: In Martinez Ojeda v. Jaddou, negotiated a federal stipulation under which USCIS scheduled the client’s asylum interview and agreed to work toward completing adjudication of the long-delayed application.
- Five Asylum Interview Delays Broken: Served as lead counsel in five separately reported mandamus cases in which USCIS issued asylum-interview notices within 60 days of receiving the federal complaints.
- Five Immigration Applications Adjudicated Within 60 Days: Served as lead counsel in two adjustment-of-status matters and three asylum matters that were adjudicated within 60 days after USCIS received the respective mandamus complaints.
- Release from Immigration Detention: Led a mandamus action that resulted in a detained client’s release within 60 days after USCIS received the complaint.
- EB-5 and Adjustment Applications Adjudicated: Overcame active Justice Department opposition in an EB-5 mandamus matter and obtained adjudication of both the client’s I-526E petition and I-485 adjustment application.
- Two-Year Green-Card Delay Resolved: After an I-485 application had remained pending for more than two years, federal litigation produced an interview notice within approximately one month. USCIS approved the application the day after the interview.
Meet Jessica
No video submitted by attorney yet.
Ready to speak with this attorney?
Be sure to mention FreddieFender.com
Before You Hire
Choosing the right attorney is an important decision, and knowing what to ask can help you make it with confidence. We've prepared a set of questions for each area of practice to help you better understand an attorney's experience, approach, fees, and what to expect before making your decision.
Select an area of practice below to see the questions you should ask before hiring an attorney.
