Freddie Fender Verified Attorney

Joshua L. Goldstein
Immigration Law
Ready to speak with this attorney?
Be sure to mention FreddieFender.com
Freddie's Review
The Government Stopped Answering. Joshua L. Goldstein Built a Nationwide Federal-Court Practice to Force a Decision
For families trapped in immigration delay, silence can last for years. Calls lead nowhere. Status pages never change. A spouse remains overseas, a citizenship application gathers dust, or a family’s future sits inside the vague bureaucratic category known as “administrative processing.” Joshua L. Goldstein built his practice for the moment waiting stops being reasonable. His response is not another inquiry—it is a federal lawsuit demanding that the government make a decision.
The scale of that strategy becomes clear in his credentials. Goldstein is admitted to the United States Supreme Court, four federal appellate courts, and nearly 40 federal district courts across the country. It is one of the most impressive federal-court admission records FreddieFender has encountered while establishing this directory. More importantly, it is not résumé decoration. Those admissions reflect a national practice built to file immigration-delay lawsuits wherever a client’s case and the governing law require action.
The legal tool at the center of that work is a writ of mandamus. In plain language, it asks a federal judge to require an agency or consulate to perform a duty it has left unfinished. The lawsuit cannot guarantee an approval, but it can force a stalled case back into motion. Goldstein has made that narrow and highly technical form of litigation a defining part of his career, using it for delayed visas, green cards, citizenship applications, and other immigration matters stranded without a final decision.
One family had waited approximately 18 months while a pregnant wife and young son remained overseas. The husband was initially afraid that suing the government might make matters worse. Goldstein remained convinced that legal action could help. After the mandamus lawsuit was filed, the administrative-processing delay ended within 23 days and the consulate requested the wife’s final medical examination, clearing the family’s path toward reunification.
Another couple had endured approximately five years of separation. Their paperwork was complete, but the husband’s visa remained unresolved after his interview. Goldstein’s firm filed suit, and approximately 35 days later, the husband received his visa. He traveled to the United States, reunited with his wife, and met his daughter in person for the first time. In a separate matter that had remained stalled for four years, a spousal visa was approved approximately two and a half months after the client retained the firm and pursued mandamus relief.
His federal work extends beyond processing delays. Goldstein obtained a habeas corpus order immediately releasing an asylum seeker from immigration detention rather than leaving her to wait weeks for an ordinary bond proceeding. Another client reported that a five-year asylum delay finally produced a hearing after the firm filed suit; the asylum claim was ultimately granted. These outcomes show why access to federal court can matter so profoundly: sometimes it restores movement, and sometimes it restores freedom.
Goldstein has spent more than 26 years in immigration law and founded a practice with offices in Los Angeles and Boston. He has taught other immigration lawyers about mandamus litigation, naturalization delays, and citizenship proceedings at national American Immigration Lawyers Association programs. During the collapse of Kabul, Afghan-American families also turned to him as relatives struggled to escape and stalled visa cases collided with immediate danger—a crisis documented in national media coverage of his work.
For a person separated from family or left indefinitely without an immigration decision, patience eventually becomes paralysis. Joshua L. Goldstein built something unusually suited to that moment: a practice with the experience, geographic reach, and federal-court access to challenge delay on a national scale. Nearly 40 district-court admissions are impressive on paper. Their real significance is what they allow him to do when the government stops answering.
That combination of experience, reputation, verified professional standing, and public credibility is why Joshua L. Goldstein was included on FreddieFender.com.
Credentials
- Bachelor of Arts in History, Claremont McKenna College (1991).
- Juris Doctor, Boston University School of Law (1997).
- Admitted to the Massachusetts Bar, Board of Bar Overseers No. 644450 (1999).
- Admitted to the New York State Bar, Registration No. 3033263 (2000).
- Active member of the State Bar of California, Bar No. 332467 (2020).
- Admitted to the Washington State Bar, License No. 61773 (2023).
- Admitted to the Supreme Court of the United States.
- Admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
- Admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
- Admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
- Admitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana.
- Admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.
- Member, American Immigration Lawyers Association, Southern California Chapter.
- Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association Immigration Law Section.
- Speaks English and Spanish.
Career Highlights / Proven Experience
Career Highlights
- Firm Founder: Founded Goldstein Immigration Lawyers, an immigration practice with offices in Los Angeles and Boston that concentrates heavily on federal litigation involving delayed visas, green cards, naturalization applications, and other stalled immigration matters.
- More Than 26 Years in Immigration Law: Has practiced since 1999 and developed a nationwide immigration and federal-court practice encompassing mandamus litigation, family immigration, citizenship, adjustment of status, removal defense, immigration appeals, and release from immigration detention.
- National Immigration-Delay Focus: Built a distinctive practice around writ-of-mandamus lawsuits—federal actions asking a court to require an agency or consulate to decide an immigration matter that has remained unresolved for an unreasonable period.
- National Immigration-Law Instructor: Has taught immigration lawyers at American Immigration Lawyers Association programs on FBI name-check litigation, delayed immigration adjudications, mandamus actions, naturalization review proceedings, adjustment of status, consular processing, and citizenship.
- AILA National Conference Faculty: Presented on immigration delays, mandamus litigation, and naturalization review at the 2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association National Conference and later addressed citizenship and naturalization at its 2016 Annual Conference.
- Former Immigration-Court Liaison: Served as the American Immigration Lawyers Association New England Chapter’s liaison to the Boston Immigration Court, facilitating communication between immigration practitioners and the federal immigration-court system.
- Professional-Service Leadership: Served on the National Lawyers Guild Massachusetts Chapter’s Lawyer Referral Service oversight committee, which helped connect members of the public with legal representation at accessible rates.
- Community Immigration Service: Provided volunteer immigration assistance through the City of Boston’s Office of New Bostonians and has remained involved with the Silver Lake Independent Jewish Community Center in Los Angeles.
- Peer Recognition: Selected to Massachusetts Super Lawyers in Immigration Law in 2013 and 2014 after an earlier Rising Stars selection in 2009.
- National Media Authority: Consulted by journalists regarding diversity visas, administrative delays, changing immigration policies, and the danger facing families during the fall of Afghanistan. The Daily Beast documented the reliance Afghan-American families placed on him during the Kabul evacuation crisis.
- Academic Recognition: Named a Paul J. Liacos Scholar while attending Boston University School of Law.
- Public Immigration Education: Has published immigration guidance and participated in public programs explaining visa delays, naturalization, administrative processing, and changing immigration policies to immigrants, families, businesses, and other attorneys.
Proven Experience
- Immediate Release from Immigration Detention: Obtained a federal habeas corpus order requiring the immediate release of an asylum seeker from immigration custody. The court agreed that the client’s prompt self-reporting undermined the government’s concern that she intended to flee or destroy property, allowing her to leave detention without waiting weeks for an ordinary bond proceeding.
- 18-Month Visa Delay Broken in 23 Days: Represented a United States citizen whose pregnant wife and young son remained abroad while her visa sat in administrative processing for approximately 18 months. After Goldstein filed a mandamus lawsuit, the processing delay ended within 23 days and the consulate requested the final medical examination, clearing the family’s path toward reunification.
- Four-Year Spousal Visa Approved in Approximately 2½ Months: Assisted a husband whose effort to bring his wife to the United States had remained unresolved since 2019. Following mandamus litigation, the visa was approved approximately two and a half months after he retained the firm, allowing the couple to begin their life together in the United States.
- Family Reunited Approximately 35 Days After Filing: Represented a family that had endured approximately five years of separation while a husband’s visa remained in administrative processing. The husband received his visa approximately 35 days after the mandamus action was filed, joined his family in the United States, and met his daughter in person for the first time.
- Asylum Granted After a Five-Year Delay: A former client reported that an asylum claim had remained unresolved for five years before Goldstein’s team filed a mandamus lawsuit. The litigation produced a hearing date, and the client’s asylum application was ultimately granted, bringing the client and family long-awaited security.
Meet Joshua
No video submitted by attorney yet.
Ready to speak with this attorney?
Be sure to mention FreddieFender.com
Before You Hire
Choosing the right attorney is an important decision, and knowing what to ask can help you make it with confidence. We've prepared a set of questions for each area of practice to help you better understand an attorney's experience, approach, fees, and what to expect before making your decision.
Select an area of practice below to see the questions you should ask before hiring an attorney.
